data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0732a/0732a315bfa81f875d8a91ebde345d1b65794719" alt=""
Now, what do I think of Helena? I decided to read it mainly because of its connection with a historical period I have been interested in lately: the Tetrarchy and its aftermath. Helena was the mother of Constantine, and Constantine can be considered the real epitome of those turbulent years. In the first chapters, Waugh's fluent and vivid prose manages to unfold a series of events and characters that would have required lengthy volumes in the hands of other writers. The main achievement of this novel is the fact that it is written by a marvellous, unique author. Towards the end, however, the story becomes more predictable: instead of characters' confrontations or the resolution of conflicts, we are left with Helena's solitary quest for religious meanings, and relics. Rather than a major literary work, what we have here is a minor literary exercise. But Waugh's prose and literary talent are there, which makes it, somehow, a minor masterpiece, if that's possible. On the other hand, the historical facts are quite accurate in general, showing Waugh's erudition and efforts in documentation, which is always required in a historical novel. So yes, a little masterpiece in the field of historical novels.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada